The Animation Guild‘s executive board is praising its tentative agreement with Hollywood studios after a handful of negotiation committee members posted on social media that they will vote not to ratify it.
The board noted in a message to members on Wednesday that it had voted to recommend the ratification of the provisional deal, which was reached with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers on Nov. 22. “We believe this agreement is the strongest contract the Union has negotiated in the last decade with significant craft improvements, substantial wage increases, and critical new protections,” the board wrote in its statement. “The Executive Board supports the agreement because Guild members as a whole stand to greatly benefit from its terms, across all crafts.”
Citing an unspecified “misleading media story” about a “small minority” that does not support the deal, the executive board noted that the negotiations committee’s “table team” that met directly with the AMPTP, an “overwhelming majority” — more than 90 percent — voted for the deal and to recommend ratification.
The Animation Guild’s 56-member negotiations committee consists of 29 members on this “table team” as well as 27 members who served on a “support team” that helped craft and make adjustments to proposals but did not vote on the tentative agreement.
The statement arrives after a few members of this larger negotiations committee — one on the table team and two on the support team — expressed on social media that they were voting “no” on the deal. Mitchell vs. The Machines writer-director Mike Rianda, writer Joey Clift (PAW Patrol, Spirit Rangers) and My Little Pony: Make Your Mark writer Kelly Lynne D’Angelo posted on Tuesday that they had personally decided not to support ratifying the agreement, with all citing concerns around the tentative contract’s provisions on generative AI.
On Dec. 3, negotiations committee support team member Spencer Rothbell additionally posted on X and Blusky that “the contract is weak on protections against use of AI and subcontracting among other things.” He noted that there are gains on items like wages and benefits but added “the structures for AI usage don’t inspire a ton of confidence (e.g. they seem very exploitable). same goes for vague/flexible language on benefits, return to work, and new media. def some loopholes.”
“Generative AI is a complex and deeply concerning issue for our industry, and we recognize the passion and apprehension it has sparked among our members,” the executive board wrote in its statement. “We are absolutely committed to protecting our industry. It’s also important to understand that union contracts alone cannot solve this challenge, as seen in the recent contracts of other entertainment unions with far larger memberships and leverage than our own.” The executive board argued that the path forward will include provisions on generative AI in its contracts as well as contract enforcement, unionizing of new workplaces, legislation, tax incentives and “public support for human-made work.”
The group concluded, “This contract balances progress with leverage, addressing challenges and delivering meaningful gains that we have been working on for years during numerous contract cycles. We trust our members will see this as a significant step forward and vote yes to ratify the agreement.”
The union’s ratification process began on Tuesday and concludes on Dec. 22. In an interview on Tuesday with The Hollywood Reporter, The Animation Guild’s business representative Steve Kaplan stated that it could be potentially “dangerous” not to ratify with the contract, which would send negotiators back to the table for a potentially quick additional bargaining process that could risk losing some gains in the pre-existing pact and/or a strike, which might “exacerbate an already-established practice of moving work to incentivized areas that would be out of the reach of the agreement.”
